Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Pet peeves of bad web design

We're not in 1998 anymore. Sorry. Things are better now in the future. We don't need to have websites that show you a top 10 list one page at a time anymore. Please, stop doing it. I'm more likely to get fed up and leave your lame site than to keep clicking and reading. Make it all one page!

Time Magazine gets a special "FUCK YOU" for not giving a list of items in a top 10 and making you go through every fucking page just to find out what they think the greatest graphic novel of all time is.

Ironically, Web Pages That Suck seems to kind of suck itself. (Mostly for ugly design.)

Photo slideshows need to die too. Especially the ones that automatically start. I hate loading a slideshow in a tab for later only to come to it and find that it's already on page 10 or something. Splash pages and auto-playing music need to go to (along with the whole of MySpace), but I guess I should just be thankful that I don't see websites with frames or "IE compatible" badges or magical mouse trails anymore.

Do you have any pet peeves of bad web design that are still lurking around? Please feel free to post in the comments section. (Note: I recognize the fact that my website is just plain hideous)

Edit: Ryan Block and Veronica Belmont's the Vintage Web also showcases websites that are stuck in the days of Internet Explorer 5.

Saturday, March 28, 2009

All things need a home

One day, a game designer was playing Tetris and said, "What if I was playing this type of game, but at the same time had a huge erection?" Bubble Bath Babes was born.
I just found out that former EGM writer Seanbaby will be contributing to Cracked. Does this mean that the internet will now get over it's deficiency of Jean-Claude Van Damme references and Phil Collins with dicks in his mouth jokes? Joy!

His first article is on the 10 Most Perverted Old School Videogames.

[Edit: Apparently the Cracked article is a censored version of the article from his website.]

Forthwith and without explanation

I like this scathingly delightful Windows ad in which "Lauren" cunningly disses Apple for being pricey and elitist.
<a href="http://video.msn.com/?mkt=en-US&playlist=videoByUuids:uuids:0bb6a07c-c829-4562-8375-49e6693810c7&showPlaylist=true&from=shared" target="_new" title="Laptop Hunters $1000 – Lauren Gets an HP Pavilion">Video: Laptop Hunters $1000 – Lauren Gets an HP Pavilion</a>
I mean, it's true. The Apple tax is a real thing. There's a sense of entitlement when I whip out my iPod touch in public, but it really is about $100 - 150 overpriced. If I had a MacBook, I imagine that feeling of "betterness" would only be stronger. And yes, this is really just thinly veiled jealousy. I'd love to have a MacBook provided that all models finally featured the anti-glare screen. I hate the shiny, glossy screen that Apple has on there now.

Also of interest: leaked Uncharted 2 gameplay footage!

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

SLATER!

Saved by the Bell meets Raining Blood and South of Heaven. Nice.

Oh, and the Where the Wild Things Are trailer has landed. With music by Arcade Fire.

Um... I should probably start writing my Rhetoric paper now...

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

I Love You, Batman

I just got done reading Frank Miller and Jim Lee's All Star Batman and Robin the Boy Wonder issues one through nine. On one hand, I want to say that Frank Miller has no business touching Batman again, but then I remember the good times with Year One and the Dark Knight Returns... But then there was the bad with the Dark Knight Strikes Back (which I'd say is easily the worst comic I have ever read). So what's so bad about All Star Batman? Well, it's not necessarily bad, it's just that Frank Miller writes everyone as the biggest bunch of assholes to ever have employed word balloons. This is not canonical Batman. In All Star Batman, Batman is a sadistic jerk who basically abuses Robin both mentally and physically. It's rather grotesque. And the Joker? He was in an issue, but instead of being either a gleeful funster or a lovable psycho, he's just a straight up rip-off of the main villain from the movie Red Dragon, tattoo and all.

My issues with the story and characterization aside (although it was funny for a while to see Batman paint himself yellow when dealing with the Green Lantern), the art by Jim Lee is characteristically astounding. Jim Lee may just draw my favorite version of Batman ever in All Star Batman. Although I haven't read Hush in a while, All Star Batman somehow seems like it's more consistent. I almost feel guilty for saying that I like Jim Lee's art and that that's somehow gauche (like liking Todd McFarlane), but the fact is that it is stunning work. On that point, I have no contention with All Star Batman.

That aside, I think I'd like to recapitulate an idea I heard a while ago that will make your life as a geek far more sane and friendly. The idea is simple: Make your own canon. You needn't be concerned with what DC considers official canon and how this and that work together to get x, y, and z. You, as the surveyor of all of this content, are responsible for stitching together your own canon to find something that suits you and how you see these various universes. Let's use Star Wars as an example since everyone seems to have an opinion on that.

Episodes IV, V, and VI are the original trilogy. Most geeks would sustain the idea that Episodes I, II, and III were absolute horseshit. I am of this school of thought as well, but I take it one step further. In my Star Wars universe, the only thing that matters are the first three movies in their original forms. All of the novels that Kevin J. Anderson or whoever penned and all of this bullshit Battle for Endor stuff doesn't exist in my Star Wars universe and I'm happier for it. Sure, I can enjoy Knights of the Old Republic a great deal, and it does feel like Star Wars to me, but ultimately in the grand scheme of things, it's only the original trilogy that counts.

Now let's get back to Batman. To me, the real origin stories and mannerisms of many of Batman's Rogues Gallery and the like come from Bruce Timm's Batman the Animated Series. It's not just because I watched that as a kid, it's because I think that the Animated Series artfully tells the stories of many aspects of the Batman universe in a cogent and masterful way. What the Animated Series did with Mr. Freeze is irreversible -- they actually made him a good Batman villain, and one you care about to no less! Bruce Timm's fantastic art is also how I visualize many of Batman's nemesi. And let's not forget that it's the Animated Series that brought us Harley Quinn...

So in my own personal Batman universe, Kevin Conroy is the true voice of the bat and Bruce Wayne. To me, Mark Hamil's cackles as the Joker are nothing less than perfect. It's not to say that I don't accept other Batman universes or that I can't live with them simultaneously. I love what Christopher Nolan has done with Batman. From the bottom of my geeky little heart, I really do. The Dark Knight just gets better and better every time I see it. And Heath Ledger's joker? Brilliant. Jack Nicholson's? Also brilliant. They're two extreme takes on a delightful character, but when I personally imagine Batman and his escapades, it's the Animated Series that usually prevails.

So when I read All Star Batman, I don't necessarily get too angry. It's just another version of Batman. I may not agree with Frank Miller's sick little joke, but I can easily put it aside. It's not for me. Maybe in Frank Miller's own personal Batman canon, Batman is a psychotic dick that will happily hit kids and thinks that everyone that's not him is a gigantic idiot. Or maybe I'm just not old enough to be that bitter yet...

Thursday, March 19, 2009

I think it's because they "Don't give a shit"

That must be the Apple corporate motto when considering iTunes for Windows. This great big bastard of an application is the most sluggish, ill-conceived piece of software I currently have installed on my machine. After updating to 8.1, I'm frustrated as hell again -- and it's over the tiniest little thing! Looking back, 8.1 is only a tenth of the travesty that 7.0 was. Now 7.0, that was a real mess and Apple should still be ashamed of it. All that pisses me off about iTunes 8.1 is that there's a bug so that it doesn't remember whether you like to have the timer countdown to how much time there is left in the song or how long the song is in total. I told you it was minuscule, but it's the fact that Apple can't even get that little thing right that pisses me off so much.

Doesn't anyone test the Windows version? Considering the fact that more people use Windows machines (although Macs have really shot up since they moved away from PowerPC), I'm guessing that most people use iTunes and the iTunes Store on a Windows machine. But as long as Apple gets paid, I'm sure they don't care. iTunes is bloated and slow and needs a complete re-working from the ground up. A good start would be getting rid of QuickTime which comes coupled with it. I understand that iTunes uses QuickTime's assets or whatever, but that's just an asinine way to try and force Windows users to use another piece of software that performs poorly in Windows (And who needs it with Media Player Classic or VLC?).

I'm mad as hell, but I have no choice but to take it since I'm tied down to the software because of my iPod touch. It's not that other software is much better. The last time I used Windows Media Player was an even bigger nightmare than this. Now the old version of WinAmp, there's a program that was spry and trustworthy. A music player shouldn't be so complicated and bloated! Really iTunes is just a few steps away from being classified as "crapware." (You know the terrible programs that come pre-loaded on a lot of OEM machines like Adobe Reader or McAfee Internet Security or Roxio Music whatever or HP such-and-such?)

Get your shit together Apple. For all this bragging about making your applications lighter and smaller in the upcoming Snow Leopard version of OSX, I'm betting iTunes will still be the same hulking brute drowning in molasses.

/rant

Monday, March 16, 2009

They're tone-deaf, evil fiends!

A bit of a forewarning: The following post is a bunch of "shop talk" regarding Chrono Trigger. If you don't talk shop, it's likely to be uninteresting.

My favorite games of all time used to be condensed into a simple three item list including Final Fantasy VII, EarthBound, and Chrono Trigger. However, recently trying to replay Final Fantasy VII on my PS3 led me to reconsider it's place on the list. My memories of that game are nothing less than pure wonder, but the graphics and the script need desperate touch-ups and outright reconstruction from the ground up. I still love the Materia system, but early 3D games such as this are becoming increasingly difficult to play for me (It's not just how they look either, it's the actual manipulation of the environment that's difficult to stomach as well). But that's beside the point. I'm here to talk about the re-release of another one of my favorites and that's Chrono Trigger on the Nintendo DS.

There are no amount of superlatives that I could throw at Chrono Trigger that I would find satisfying in expressing my feelings for the game. The DS version proves this. The graphics are still fantastic two-dimensional representations of Akira Toriyama, the soundtrack still sublime and exemplary of Yasunori Mitsuda, and the story is fun and brisk allowing your imagination to fill in the gaps (something current RPGs could take a lesson from). I don't know how to preach to the unconverted, so instead I'll talk about what's new to the DS version.

First, the script is given an upgrade. It's largely the same, however in some areas there's added clarity and the heavy-handed efforts of NOA to "sissify" the game are now pretty much removed. You no longer down gallons of "soup" with Ayla in 65,000,000 BC. Instead you're drinking "skull smash" because after a night of partying, it feels like your skull has been smashed in. The script feels a little more formal all-around, but I don't I think there's anything to complain about at all. It doesn't seem to be as big of a change as the Final Fantasy VI script for the GameBoy Advance underwent, but it's still a good re-working.

Second, there is new equipment that can be obtained in three new areas. The first new area is a monster arena that's not really worth discussing or investing in. It requires too much babysitting in order to cultivate a monster that's capable of a lot and it's not exactly enthralling to watch your monster attack another one when you're not able to control it. The other new area is the Lost Sanctum which is a Reptite lair in Prehistoric and Medieval times. There's some valuable equipment to be gained here (such as the Elemental Aegis which grants Lucca elemental immunity or the Dragon's Tear which increases the chance of a critical hit), but it's really a series time consuming sidequests because the Sanctum requires a lot of backtracking. And finally, there are the Dimensional Vortices that appear in Antiquity, the Present, and the Future. Each one of these supports a new area (one of which features the previously unused track "The Singing Mountain") and new enemies and some really excellent gear (Angel's Tiara gives Auto-Haste and status immunity!). All of this leads to a new final boss and a new ending which (un)fortunately gives credence to Chrono Cross' plot.

In the SNES version of Chrono Trigger (which I'm now afraid to boot up for fear of finding that my save battery has died), I found that the most effective party was Chrono (for Luminaire), Marle and Ayla (for Iceberg Toss and Charm). Now with new equipment however, I've found a slightly tweaked party that deals out damage in spades. Giving Ayla a Dragon's Tear or Valor Crest (increased chance of criticals, counter rate of 50%) for when she has Bronze Fist makes her deal out 9,999 damage far more frequently. She's a certified beast now. Then who departs from my original three? That'd be Marle. Unfortunately, her Venus Bow (which guarantees 777 damage) just doesn't save her. Final Kick is still quite excellent and overall she's still very useful, but I'm afraid I've found someone else... Instead, I've got Robo in the mix. I never found him to be very good in the original game. Along with Lucca, he was my least used character. Now, with Apocalypse Arm (which deals 9,999 damage on critical) and a Dragon's Tear, you've got another beast. Plus he has Heal Beam, which increases in effectiveness when you give him some Magic Tabs and solves the problem of not having a Single Tech multi-party heal. With the new equipment though, you'll likely not be needing it. In fact, even the new final boss wasn't a challenge because of this. You're welcome to go ahead and not use these tactics or try a low level game though.

One thing I'm kind of glad that they've addressed in the Lost Sanctum is that you can no longer just spam Crono's Luminaire with a Gold Stud anymore since most of the enemies there absorb Light damage. In that case, I've got Magus stepping in for him. Dark Mist is enough to take care of most of the threats you'll face there. His new Dreamreaper scythe will also give him some melee aptitude since it gives 4x damage for when he lands a critical hit. So while you can no longer just roll over everything with Luminaire, there's still not much challenge when you figure out that Magus is one of your better bets in the Sanctum. Also, the pink Nu version of Spekkio is now a push-over thanks to Lucca's Elemental Aegis so given the right setup, there's nothing to be afraid of anymore.

So yes, Chrono Trigger for the DS is highly approved. The game is treated with respect and it's still a joy to play. It would have been nice to have a harder difficulty in New Game+ that leveled up all the monsters, but what we really need is a true successor to Chrono Trigger and I'm afraid Chrono Cross just doesn't cut it. It has no regard for the style or mechanics that made Trigger good. Trigger was a simple and elegant RPG that was brisk and had tons of replay value. Cross was a convoluted nightmare that merely had a soundtrack with some really excellent tracks. The successor to Trigger needs to be small and charming not ambitious and grotesque. It also doesn't need 40 some useless party members without any character development.

So that's my brain dump for Chrono Trigger DS. It's got the "Square Enix tax" on it, but for $40, I don't think you'll find a better RPG to play on the DS. Granted I haven't played Dragon Quest V, but I'm very confident in asserting that'll probably be far more hardcore and unforgiving. Chrono Trigger on the other hand, is an excellent first RPG -- which is not to say that it's dumbed down or lesser. No, it's quite the opposite. There's a reason that the team behind it was called the "Dream Team." Chrono Trigger is still one of the pinnacles of not just Japanese RPGs or 16-bit games, but of gaming as a whole.

You get a line, I'll get a pole, we'll go fishin' at the crocodile hole

Amazon is having a Blu-ray sale until the 22nd of March. Season 2 of Weeds is $13, A Clockwork Orange is $13, Reservoir Dogs is $12, American Psycho is $12, the 40 Year Old Virgin is $15, the Road Warrior is $14, Ratatouille is $20. If I didn't have some bills to pay...

In this age of Netflix, I think the only movies I'll be purchasing from now on are Blu-ray versions of movies I love (a few of which where listed above). For instance, Monster's, Inc. is supposed to be coming out this Spring on Blu-ray according to Bolt. Who needs to have shelves filled with plastic clutter anymore? Although, I'll admit there is something satisfying about having that wall of games and DVDs. It's something that says who you are while asking "Do you like me?" Narcissistic, but comforting.

The 1980s invented awesome

via BuzzFeed. This is why I'm glad that I grew up in the '80s (or at least with it in my periphery). You poor unfortunate souls that only had the '90s will never have something this awesome. What would you have? Someone making a medley video of the "Macarena," Right Said Fred's "I'm Too Sexy," and TLC's "Waterfalls?" No thanks.

Now, here's how they one-up themselves: Do a medley video of '80s videogame tunes. Mega Man and Castlevania? Hell yes. Perhaps it's a bit more hashed-out (what with thousands of videos of people playing the Super Mario Bros. theme already), but I think that it could still be very cool.

Also check out this interesting mash-up of the Beatles, the Kinks, and LCD Soundsystem. It's certainly not 1980s related, but I think it's worth a listen.


On another note, does anyone know how to get sexy looking high quality YouTube embed code like BuzzFeed uses versus the ugly, plain versions that YouTube gives you by default? I know there's a hack to add "&ap=%2526fmt%3D18" to the end of the video URL, but that doesn't quite cut it. Does anyone know the window dimensions that BuzzFeed uses? Also, why isn't YouTube smart enough now to know when you're embedding 4x3 or 16x9 video?

Thursday, March 12, 2009

No one gets me except for my monkey

One of the first sane reviews of Watchmen that I've heard comes from KCSU. Why nerds have to either love something so much that they're about to burst or they hate it so much that they scorch the earth around them, I've no idea. The middle ground is so much calmer, and often closer to the truth. But I guess that's why the subtitle to this blog is "oubliette for truth." This is where the truth comes to die and be forgotten. But search your feelings, you know it to be true: Watchmen is just okay... if that.

Monday, March 9, 2009

Get ready to geek


I recall Leo Laporte or someone else on Twit saying that it is only just now that computer hardware has caught up with the GUI. Back in the day of just a text interface and whatnot, stuff was fast because there wasn't a lot to it. Then, when the GUI came about, everything. slowed. down. Now, my mom's $500 laptop runs Vista more briskly and smoothly than my decrepit box runs XP. If you're just an "average" user, there should be nothing impeding you from doing what you have to do. Now that just needs to leak over into video editing and gaming...

Friday, March 6, 2009

It's the hair

I used to respect Nicolas Cage. Not because we both spell our first name the same way, but because he's actually made some really good movies. Raising Arizona. Adaptation. Leaving Las Vegas. Movies that are entertaining. Vampire's Kiss. Con Air. The Rock (if only to say "the rock" with your best Sean Connery impersonation). So the guy should have some clout, right? Yeah, except that I can't think of a single recent film from him that was good. I abhor the National Treasure movies. Every single film that tries to be an "Indiana Jones movie" is always atrocious, which I don't understand. I love Raiders of the Lost Ark and the Last Crusade, but I feel somehow morally opposed to such films as Sahara and the DaVinci Code. But that's an entirely different issue I suppose...

Today I read an article on Cracked that starts to peck away at how I've felt about Nicolas Cage for the past... I don't know... seven years. What's happened to this guy? Does he just not care anymore? Is it just a paycheck to him? And what's with that godawful hair?

Anyone else feel similarly?

Moment of Truth

I remember in high school that going to see the Lord of the Rings films was an officially sanctioned way to get out of class and go see something that was entertaining. They were epic, landmark films and I look back on those experiences very fondly. Today, I ditched class after sleeping on a wooden floor so that I could see Watchmen. Unfortunately, I'm not going to be Moses coming down the mountain here. To put it bluntly: this movie has flaws.

There were so many choices that I saw as inappropriate. The soundtrack is a clashing, incongruous mess. Jimmy Hendrix's cover of "All Along the Watchtower" as Night Owl and Rorschach approach Ozymandias' base in the Archimedes? The use of Nena's "99 Luftballoons"? Bob Dylan's "The Times They Are A-Changin'"? Even though Watchmen is based around historical things, I don't feel that those songs were of that world at all. They took me out of the movie entirely as I would roll my eyes or cringe at them. I would have much rather had a good score placed behind these scenes. Sticking old pop songs on top of them is cheap.

The ultra-violence is also something I could have done entirely without. There were several moments where I had to look away from the screen because the violence was sickening. It's also the ultra-violence that ruins much of Kill Bill for me. I find it stupid mostly -- it's over the top and seems to have no purpose other than grossing you out or proposing a self-declaration that the film that you're watching is "badass." I think the most effective form of violence is something that you don't see. I hate to bring up the Dark Knight, but I feel far more menace and fear and danger in that world than I do in the Watchmen. Not everything needs to be so blunt. Subtlety is far more elegant and effective.

The acting is also something that took me out of the film. In parts it's embarrassing (not to mention the embarrassment that comes from the "orgasm scene") and I never felt that these where real people as opposed to actors. Jackie Earle Haley does a pretty good job as Rorschach I guess, and maybe in a better film his performance would have been stronger. Billy Crudup had a very difficult job in portraying Dr. Manhattan. It's nearly impossible to warm up to something that's near emotionless. Unfortunately, he didn't succeed, but I think it's just in the nature of the role. Patrick Wilson's Night Owl is more of an awkward nerd than I read him, but that's probably closer to how he should be read. He should be awkward and you should feel sorry for him, but you should also find triumph and reinvigoration in him as well when he progresses. I didn't really feel that in the film. It's there, but it's not developed.

What is there to like though? For being just shy of three hours, the film does encapsulate a good deal of the story. However, I doubt that anyone who hasn't read Watchmen will fully get the movie and will probably be severely confused at times. Technology and film making have advanced far enough that the movie isn't poorly or cheaply done (although I am not a fan of much of the style of it). Even X-Men or Spider-man feel dated and laughable now, so it's good that we at least waited at least this long to attempt to make the film. It's unfortunate that this film had to come out after Dark Knight because that isn't just a great superhero movie, it's a great movie. Watchmen feels just like a superhero movie, however. And as far as those go, in some respects I prefer Watchmen to the overly "wink-wink" style that the Marvel films have that make you feel like you're in on some kind of joke (when really that just makes them cheesy and reduces them to merely "popcorn" movies). Sure there are some silly 300 references, but those can easily be ignored.

But even for all of it's flaws, I don't hate it and I don't have any ill will to those who made it. I have my version of how I see Watchmen, and they have theirs. I can deal with that. Is this a film that will be looked at in later generations as something that changed cinema? Absolutely not. My only hope is that if someone sees this movie and dislikes it that they don't apply those same prejudices towards the comic, which is still phenomenal.

Grade: C+

Thursday, March 5, 2009

This man is a visionary!

What Radiohead and Nine Inch Nails did for music these past few years? Child's play, sirs! Allow me to introduce to you Josh Freese. Sure you can pay $7 to get a digital download version of Josh's new album or pay a little more for the physical copy, but then we start getting into some interesting options. Allow me to demonstrate.

For $250, you get a signed CD/DVD and digital download, T-shirt, signed drum head and drumsticks, and a lunch date with Josh to P.F. Chang's or The Cheesecake Factory.

For $1000, you get a signed CD/DVD and digital download, T-shirt, signed cymbal, drum head and drumsticks, Josh washes your car OR does your laundry....or you can wash his car. You also get to have dinner with Josh aboard the "Queen Mary" in Long Beach, CA then get drunk and cut each other's hair in the parking lot of the Long Beach courthouse (filmed and posted on YouTube of course).

And for the big papa price of $75,000 (limited edition of 1), you get a signed CD/DVD and digital download, T-shirt, go on tour with Josh for a few days, have Josh write, record and release a 5 song EP about you and your life story, take home any of his drumsets (only one but you can choose which one.), take shrooms and cruise Hollywood in Danny from TOOL's Lamborghini OR play quarters and then hop on the Ouija board for a while, Josh will join your band for a month...play shows, record, party with groupies, etc.... or if you don't have a band he'll be your personal assistant for a month (4 day work weeks, 10 am to 4 pm), take a limo down to Tijuana and he'll show you how it's done (what that means exactly we can't legally get into here), if you don't live in Southern California (but are a US resident) he'll come to you and be your personal assistant/cabana boy for 2 weeks, take a flying trapeze lesson with Josh and Robin from NIN, go back to Robin's place afterward and his wife will make you raw lasagna.

Amazing!

Wednesday, March 4, 2009

The day the world went away

I'm not sure if it's the Nine Inch Nails song that sells the new Terminator: Salvation trailer or whether it actually looks like a good movie.

What do you think? Do you think the song is making the movie seem better than it is? Are there any other trailers that sold themselves because of the song in them? Is this the case for the 500 Days of Summer trailer as well?

Monday, March 2, 2009

They still rock the party

It's a sad thing to know that this season of Flight of the Conchords will be the last. You could say something about how a star that burns twice as bright burns out twice as fast, but that doesn't quite sell the severity of our loss. I respect the Conchords for wanting to courteously bow out now, but that's sort of difficult when I would argue that pound for pound and laugh for laugh, this season is even better than the first. Arj Barker's awkward bullshitting has really been refined making him a better comic foil whereas Eugene Mirman is even shadier and more delightfully unscrupulous. Rhys Darby (Murray) is still charmingly naive and Kristen Schaal (Mel) psychopathic. The show feels tighter and the songs don't feel like they overstay their welcome like a few from the first season did. I'll be sad to see them go, but they can go out with pride knowing they've created and maintained something special. (Unlike, say The Simpsons...)

Recently, Sony has offered several premiere episodes of new MTV shows for free on the PlayStation Network, one of which was the new College Humor show. It's a real shame that this show has to be on traditional network TV (and on a scuzzy channel like MTV no less), because it's very good. This show should not be constrained to such old and outdated practices that the likes of MTV or anyone else would enforce on it. That the show is censored is ridiculous. It's insulting and it's dishonest. That this new generation should still have to bend to old media is a travesty. MTV would still like to think of itself as something fresh, but in reality it's a decrepit dinosaur with a loud, shiny coat of paint. College Humor is doing MTV a favor by allowing it to broadcast it's show -- not the other way around. But other than this misstep, the show is shaping up to be something great.